truth does not hurt much when compared with death. Hacete
analysis of HIV screening. Use condoms. Informate.
fight together. AIDS does not discriminate, neither should we.
Matias Lo Cascio.
Tuesday, November 30, 2010
Jeff Hardy's Clothing
December 1
truth does not hurt much when compared with death. Hacete
analysis of HIV screening. Use condoms. Informate.
fight together. AIDS does not discriminate, neither should we.
Matias Lo Cascio.
truth does not hurt much when compared with death. Hacete
analysis of HIV screening. Use condoms. Informate.
fight together. AIDS does not discriminate, neither should we.
Matias Lo Cascio.
Saturday, November 20, 2010
How To Get An Internship At Island Def Jam
Steve Prefontaine: The indomitable athlete
A traffic accident killed in 1975, one of the greatest athletes in the global fund. With only 24 years old, Steve Prefontaine, an idol for his courage and determination, "was at the peak of his popularity, but his best years as an athlete should be yet to come. His untimely death made him a legend in athletics.
"A lot of people run to see who is fastest. I run to see who has more guts " (Steve Prefontaine)
the night of May 30, 1975 Steve Prefontaine went to a party in the town of Eugene (Oregon, USA). Back home, after dropping off his friend and great marathoner Frank Shorter, lost control of his blue MGB while driving on Skyline Boulevard and crashed into a rock. The car overturned and the athlete was caught under it. A resident of the area came and found him still alive. Seeing that he could not get, ran for help, when he returned minutes later, the weight of the car had crushed Prefontaine's chest.
never been clarified certain unknowns who planned the circumstances of the accident, such as whether or not he had drunk alcohol, or if there was a second car involved in it (it was said to be off the road while trying to dodge another vehicle coming from the front). Either way, the accident ended the life of one of the best runners I've ever had the United States actually came to possess while national records in all distances ranging from 2,000 to 10,000 meters, a feat never accomplished before or after him.
His death caused a great shock between athletics, including the Prefontaine was a true hero because of his charisma, his aggressive style when competing and will power. "Surrender is not an option," he would say. That was his philosophy in life and athletics. Talented, enthusiastic, charismatic, his love for athletics was infinite and his work ethic, impeccable: "Give anything less than your best is to sacrifice the gift", he once said. He liked to force their limits, trained hard twice a day to get used to pain and exhaustion, to endure fatigue levels than any other athlete could endure. With their careers, their memorable phrases, their determination and his infinite desire to win has served and continues to serve as an inspiration to athletes around the world.
is considered, along with Frank Shorter and Bill Bowerman, the head of the boom in distance running in America in the 70's. His life has been an argument for two films: Prefontaine (1997) and Without Limits (1998), and each year takes place in Eugene an athletics event in his honor (the Prefontaine Classic ), where brings together some of the best athletes in the world. Steve Roland Prefontaine
was born on January 25, 1951 in Coos Bay, Oregon locality. He began to practice athletics when high school student in the Marshfield High School , which already emerged as one of the best riders of his age. In 1970 he enrolled at the University of Oregon, attracted by the "supply" of the famous coach Bill Bowerman: "If you come to this university can be the best long distance runner the world," said founder who would, years later, Nike company. Indeed, Bowerman got the better of Steve Young, managing to mix his enormous capacity for sacrifice and work ethic (meticulous and perfectionist) with certain improvements in the way they train and race to dose your efforts.
" Go Pre! "
stage in college (1970-73) no American runner could win it. Were years of continued success in that it showed its enormous potential in the landscape of international fund. He won two national championships all in the 5,000 meters (1971 and 73), and seven national collegiate champion, four in the 5,000 meters in track and three in cross. Prefontaine, known colloquially as "Pre" - became immensely popular, especially for its spectacular form of racing, always on the attack ("I go running, I get the lead from the first round and won) , and his strong personality and indomitable rebel. Contesting every race as if it were the last. When running, the fans chanted "Pre! Pre! Pre!", And t-shirts that read "Go Pre!" Were sold throughout the United States. "I do not go to the track only to run. I like to give viewers something exciting, "he would say. Thus, he gained the attention of the media and went on to appear on the cover of Sports Illustrated just 19 years.
On July 9, 1972, during the selection trials in your country for the Olympic Games in Munich, set a new U.S. record United in the 5,000 meters with 13:22.8. Already in the Munich Games, with 21 years, qualified for the finals and came very close to getting a medal. After going ahead during much of the evidence, in conflict with the Finn Lasse Viren, had to settle for fourth place he knew to failure. However, wicked young and already installed in the elite of the global fund, his best years as an athlete should be to come.
Prefontaine Between 1973 and 1975 did not fail to reap new victories and personal bests, records extraordinary for its time: 3:38.1 in the 1,500; 3.54.6 in the mile, 7:42.6 in the 3,000 meters in 13:21.87 5,000, 27:43.6 in the 10,000 ... His record lasted for many years in all distances ranging from 1,500 meters to 10,000. addition, during these years, led the rebellion against U.S. athletes federation, American Athletic Union (AAU), accusing it of no help: "We call for medals, but our country does not give us anything change, "he said. At that time, the rules stipulated that professional athletes could not compete in the Olympics, and in that regard, the AAU was particularly strict, so Prefontaine gave up large amounts of money chasing his Olympic dream.
played his last race 29 May 1975. He won the 5,000 meters at Hayward Field of Eugene, with a time of 13:23, just two seconds behind his personal record. It was the favorite for the Olympic Games in Montreal, was unbeatable in the United States, a media figure, an idol of the masses ... but everything was shattered the next day in a bloody accident. "Most people race to see who is fastest. I run to see who has more guts, who can punish himself with a comprehensive rate and, ultimately, punished further. Nobody is going to win a race of 5,000 meters after running two miles easy. At least not me. " Are words of someone who won 120 of the 153 races he played. Steve Prefontaine, the indomitable athlete, could not live the bright future that was written, found the end with only 24 years old ... Too young to die.
Tuesday, October 5, 2010
How To Do Nice Bangs With Weave
The mysterious death of Ottavio Bottecchia
Terrible, terrible end, the rider of this humble son of hunger, who emigrated to France in search of glory and died in hospital twelve days after being found lying unconscious, the edge of a vineyard, with the shattered skull and several broken bones. They spoke of an accident, his opposition to the regime of Mussolini, that a farmer thought he was stealing the grapes, even a crime of passion. Eight decades later, the mystery of his death remains open.
confidential, introverted, taciturn, one might almost say that as mysterious as the end he had, Ottavio Bottecchia was the first great Italian cycling champion , precursor of idols unforgettable as Fausto Coppi and Gino Bartali. Unfortunately for him, the political situation that the country lived in the late-Alpine 1920-in stark contrast to its leftist ideas, prevent him from being a prophet in his land, making most of his victories in neighboring France.
could not be more humble origins of Ottavio Bottecchia, born on August 1, 1894 in San Martino di Colle Umberto, a small town in the Italian region of Friuli, in the bosom of a family of nine children. Raised in poverty, had to start work very early to make a living, so it just might go two years at school. Almost unable to read or write, he began working as a bricklayer while still a child. He learned to ride a bicycle during the First World War, in which he participated in the Austro-Italian front, forming part of the Bersaglieri, corps that moved bike to transmit messages to the staff. Shortly before the end of the war was captured, but escaped.
Bronze Medal for valor, after the end of the war Bottecchia (and with 27 years) is a professional dedicated to the sport, and soon reached the first successes. Their good performances in 1922 earned him to be claimed by the Frenchman Henri Pelissier, the greatest figure of the moment cyclist, who asked him to join his team, Automoto-Hutchinson. Bottecchia learned to read when he is a professional cyclist, thanks to the teachings of his friend and training partner Alfonso Piccin. Together they read the sports columns of the daily La Gazzetta dello Sport and anti-fascist leaflets . His ideas would play a trick on him at home, where he was barred from the Giro by his strong opposition to the regime of Mussolini. So, could only participate in an edition (1923), the great Italian race.
After finishing fifth in the Giro d'Italia this year, has no great pretensions to the Tour as part of Automoto to help his teammates Henri Pelissier and Belgian Lucien Buysse. However, in the second stage is done with the victory and the lead. He lost in the subsequent stages, regained it in Pirineros, and finally lost in the Alps for Pélissier, who generally take the half hour ahead of Bottecchia. The Italian was the great sensation of the Tour, appearing as a complete bike: Good Wheeler, a good sprinter, best climber, and an exceptional hardness and strength, forged through blood and fire for his miserable childhood. It was ultimately ahead of his time. "Bottecchia happen to me next year," Pelissier said then. And it ruled in his forecast the French champions.
First Italian Tour winner
Enjuto, tanned skin, eyes always lost, an aquiline nose and pointed ears (Henri Desgrange, the director of the Tour de France, referred to as " Butterfly "for this reason), Bottecchia appeared in the starting line of the Grande Boucle in 1924 with the front-runner label, a condition amply demonstrated. He won the first stage and never let the leader's jersey throughout the race, becoming the first Italian to win the Tour. would win a total of four steps and exercised undisputed dominion over all his rivals.
was aided further by the withdrawal of the militant Pélissier brothers (Henry and Francis), in constant dispute with Desgrange. A penalty for wearing two jerseys Henri-to combat the cold-and robbery in race one, led the march of testing of the two brothers and inflammatory statements about the journalist Albert Londres which led to the great metaphor of Tour : the convicts of the road. "Rather than being brokers, we are free men," angry said the greatest Pélissier.
the queen stage in the Pyrenees (Bayona-Luchon, 326 kilometers through all the giants pierenaicos) Bottecchia gave a sublime display. Given its status as leader, just needed to control their rivals (Nicolas Frantz and Lucien Buysse mainly) but since the first steep slopes of the first major port attacks like a madman. On top of the Aubisque leads his first chase in 2 minutes 40 seconds in 10:52 on the Tourmalet, the Aspin 16 minutes, 18 and a half in the Peyresourde ... Get to the goal of Luchon with a lead of 27 minutes and 58 seconds, condemning the race. "You have to see how easy it is to pedal, his style, perfection of its momentum. I have not been incorporated into his bike not once, "declared Desgrange admired. Also expire in the next step Pyrenees (Luchon-Perpignan) and the final stage in Paris.
In 1925, history repeats itself, and how, in the Tour de France. Again Bottecchia ends in the first and the last step, again achieved four wins partial, again is very superior to his rivals, again arrived in Paris with a huge difference on their pursuers (54 minutes Buysse , 56 Bartholomew Aymo fellow ...). With their opponents at an unreachable distance, began to hear criticism tagged as conservative. Enraged, the disputed Ottavio entering the final stage alone at the velodrome at the Parc des Princes, where more than 20,000 spectators paid to his talent and courage. These victories in the Tour made him a true idol. However, never lost the humility: "I am a worker of the bike," declared then.
in 1926 failed to repeat successes and retired from Tour "crying like a child." In the Pyrenees, during the stage Bayona-Luchon, was forced to abandon sick, exhausted, shattered inside and out, in the midst of a scenario that those present described as "apocalyptic" because the cold and pouring rain. To continue with the misfortunes, that same winter he lost his younger brother, Umberto, hit by a car. And soon after, the mystery.
A death unclear
On June 3, 1927 Peonis a farmer, a village near the town of residence of our protagonist, a body found dying on the side of the road, her skull broken, like a collar bone and other bones. Soon it was confirmed that Ottavio Bottecchia; him to a bar and, on a table, the priest gave him last rites. From there he was immediately taken to hospital Gemona Friuli, where he died 12 days later without regaining consciousness reached. He was 33 years.
Officially it was an accident while training. The first theory suggests that heat stroke made him fall to the ground, striking his head. However, his bike was found several meters away, leaning against a tree, and had not been stolen or damaged. Nor had tire marks that could suggest that would have forced a car off the road or had lost control of his bike.
was learned that morning Bottecchia rose at dawn and rode to the house of his great Alfonso Piccin friend to go training together. Piccin but decided not to go that day and left only Ottavio. From here, what happened is unknown. Unknown and mysterious. Some suggested a fight, but found no trace of it, others pointed to the participation in the events of a gang of black shirts, in retaliation for communist ideas Bottecchia and his outspoken opposition to the regime of Mussolini. The official investigation is closed for good the theory giving the accident and the family of the cyclist, who received a succulent compensation for his death, also showed interest in knowing more.
But in the years following to add even more confusion to the story, two people blame themselves for his death. First was an Italian emigrant in the United States who, after being wounded and arrested in a brawl with knives at a dock in New York, claiming to have killed over Ottavio and his brother Umberto on behalf of a fascist leader. Later, two decades after the fatal incident, the farmer owns the vineyard where he found Bottecchia confessed on his deathbed, accidentally killing the rider: "I saw a man eating my grapes. I threw a stone to scare, but hit him. I ran to him and I realized who he was. I panicked, dragged him to the edge of the road and left him there. God forgive me. "
Many saw gaps in this explanation: on the one hand, June is not grape season (do not mature until late summer), and secondly, to break someone's skull with a rock would have to be so large that force will be very close, which seems unlikely explanation of the farmer. Bottecchia was a local hero, and being so close would have been easily reconocible.En the police investigation was reopened then concluded that both farmer and rider knew each other, and could be a crime of passion. "accident, theft, political, crime passion ...? Eight decades later, causes the death of Italian cyclist peculiar remain cloaked-and personality-in a halo of mystery. almost certainly remain so for ever and ever.
In 1924 he became the first Italian to win the Tour de France and was only three years after a tragic death. On that event very different theories circulated and still, today, has not been able to know the truth. Premature death, cause unknown, conflicting accounts, a suspicious silence ... This is the story of the mysterious end of Ottavio Bottecchia.
destination
Terrible, terrible end, the rider of this humble son of hunger, who emigrated to France in search of glory and died in hospital twelve days after being found lying unconscious, the edge of a vineyard, with the shattered skull and several broken bones. They spoke of an accident, his opposition to the regime of Mussolini, that a farmer thought he was stealing the grapes, even a crime of passion. Eight decades later, the mystery of his death remains open.
confidential, introverted, taciturn, one might almost say that as mysterious as the end he had, Ottavio Bottecchia was the first great Italian cycling champion , precursor of idols unforgettable as Fausto Coppi and Gino Bartali. Unfortunately for him, the political situation that the country lived in the late-Alpine 1920-in stark contrast to its leftist ideas, prevent him from being a prophet in his land, making most of his victories in neighboring France.
could not be more humble origins of Ottavio Bottecchia, born on August 1, 1894 in San Martino di Colle Umberto, a small town in the Italian region of Friuli, in the bosom of a family of nine children. Raised in poverty, had to start work very early to make a living, so it just might go two years at school. Almost unable to read or write, he began working as a bricklayer while still a child. He learned to ride a bicycle during the First World War, in which he participated in the Austro-Italian front, forming part of the Bersaglieri, corps that moved bike to transmit messages to the staff. Shortly before the end of the war was captured, but escaped.
Bronze Medal for valor, after the end of the war Bottecchia (and with 27 years) is a professional dedicated to the sport, and soon reached the first successes. Their good performances in 1922 earned him to be claimed by the Frenchman Henri Pelissier, the greatest figure of the moment cyclist, who asked him to join his team, Automoto-Hutchinson. Bottecchia learned to read when he is a professional cyclist, thanks to the teachings of his friend and training partner Alfonso Piccin. Together they read the sports columns of the daily La Gazzetta dello Sport and anti-fascist leaflets . His ideas would play a trick on him at home, where he was barred from the Giro by his strong opposition to the regime of Mussolini. So, could only participate in an edition (1923), the great Italian race.
After finishing fifth in the Giro d'Italia this year, has no great pretensions to the Tour as part of Automoto to help his teammates Henri Pelissier and Belgian Lucien Buysse. However, in the second stage is done with the victory and the lead. He lost in the subsequent stages, regained it in Pirineros, and finally lost in the Alps for Pélissier, who generally take the half hour ahead of Bottecchia. The Italian was the great sensation of the Tour, appearing as a complete bike: Good Wheeler, a good sprinter, best climber, and an exceptional hardness and strength, forged through blood and fire for his miserable childhood. It was ultimately ahead of his time. "Bottecchia happen to me next year," Pelissier said then. And it ruled in his forecast the French champions.
First Italian Tour winner
Enjuto, tanned skin, eyes always lost, an aquiline nose and pointed ears (Henri Desgrange, the director of the Tour de France, referred to as " Butterfly "for this reason), Bottecchia appeared in the starting line of the Grande Boucle in 1924 with the front-runner label, a condition amply demonstrated. He won the first stage and never let the leader's jersey throughout the race, becoming the first Italian to win the Tour. would win a total of four steps and exercised undisputed dominion over all his rivals.
was aided further by the withdrawal of the militant Pélissier brothers (Henry and Francis), in constant dispute with Desgrange. A penalty for wearing two jerseys Henri-to combat the cold-and robbery in race one, led the march of testing of the two brothers and inflammatory statements about the journalist Albert Londres which led to the great metaphor of Tour : the convicts of the road. "Rather than being brokers, we are free men," angry said the greatest Pélissier.
the queen stage in the Pyrenees (Bayona-Luchon, 326 kilometers through all the giants pierenaicos) Bottecchia gave a sublime display. Given its status as leader, just needed to control their rivals (Nicolas Frantz and Lucien Buysse mainly) but since the first steep slopes of the first major port attacks like a madman. On top of the Aubisque leads his first chase in 2 minutes 40 seconds in 10:52 on the Tourmalet, the Aspin 16 minutes, 18 and a half in the Peyresourde ... Get to the goal of Luchon with a lead of 27 minutes and 58 seconds, condemning the race. "You have to see how easy it is to pedal, his style, perfection of its momentum. I have not been incorporated into his bike not once, "declared Desgrange admired. Also expire in the next step Pyrenees (Luchon-Perpignan) and the final stage in Paris.
In 1925, history repeats itself, and how, in the Tour de France. Again Bottecchia ends in the first and the last step, again achieved four wins partial, again is very superior to his rivals, again arrived in Paris with a huge difference on their pursuers (54 minutes Buysse , 56 Bartholomew Aymo fellow ...). With their opponents at an unreachable distance, began to hear criticism tagged as conservative. Enraged, the disputed Ottavio entering the final stage alone at the velodrome at the Parc des Princes, where more than 20,000 spectators paid to his talent and courage. These victories in the Tour made him a true idol. However, never lost the humility: "I am a worker of the bike," declared then.
in 1926 failed to repeat successes and retired from Tour "crying like a child." In the Pyrenees, during the stage Bayona-Luchon, was forced to abandon sick, exhausted, shattered inside and out, in the midst of a scenario that those present described as "apocalyptic" because the cold and pouring rain. To continue with the misfortunes, that same winter he lost his younger brother, Umberto, hit by a car. And soon after, the mystery.
A death unclear
On June 3, 1927 Peonis a farmer, a village near the town of residence of our protagonist, a body found dying on the side of the road, her skull broken, like a collar bone and other bones. Soon it was confirmed that Ottavio Bottecchia; him to a bar and, on a table, the priest gave him last rites. From there he was immediately taken to hospital Gemona Friuli, where he died 12 days later without regaining consciousness reached. He was 33 years.
Officially it was an accident while training. The first theory suggests that heat stroke made him fall to the ground, striking his head. However, his bike was found several meters away, leaning against a tree, and had not been stolen or damaged. Nor had tire marks that could suggest that would have forced a car off the road or had lost control of his bike.
was learned that morning Bottecchia rose at dawn and rode to the house of his great Alfonso Piccin friend to go training together. Piccin but decided not to go that day and left only Ottavio. From here, what happened is unknown. Unknown and mysterious. Some suggested a fight, but found no trace of it, others pointed to the participation in the events of a gang of black shirts, in retaliation for communist ideas Bottecchia and his outspoken opposition to the regime of Mussolini. The official investigation is closed for good the theory giving the accident and the family of the cyclist, who received a succulent compensation for his death, also showed interest in knowing more.
But in the years following to add even more confusion to the story, two people blame themselves for his death. First was an Italian emigrant in the United States who, after being wounded and arrested in a brawl with knives at a dock in New York, claiming to have killed over Ottavio and his brother Umberto on behalf of a fascist leader. Later, two decades after the fatal incident, the farmer owns the vineyard where he found Bottecchia confessed on his deathbed, accidentally killing the rider: "I saw a man eating my grapes. I threw a stone to scare, but hit him. I ran to him and I realized who he was. I panicked, dragged him to the edge of the road and left him there. God forgive me. "
Many saw gaps in this explanation: on the one hand, June is not grape season (do not mature until late summer), and secondly, to break someone's skull with a rock would have to be so large that force will be very close, which seems unlikely explanation of the farmer. Bottecchia was a local hero, and being so close would have been easily reconocible.En the police investigation was reopened then concluded that both farmer and rider knew each other, and could be a crime of passion. "accident, theft, political, crime passion ...? Eight decades later, causes the death of Italian cyclist peculiar remain cloaked-and personality-in a halo of mystery. almost certainly remain so for ever and ever.
Wednesday, September 22, 2010
Understanding Oxford Hsa
10 things that changed in me since I saw you.
10 things that changed since I saw you come to my table and said "WOW"
1 - I'm not so aware of what my friends, my schedule is free, just in case;
2 - leave me your thoughts INFLUENCE;
3 - My sweet nightmares become dreams (inevitable);
4 - I can not control my words
5 - Do not fear looking like a fool in front of others;
6 - Some songs remind me of you, even if you have memories of you;
7 - I am more aware of my cell;
8 - My watch does not mark the hours;
9 - covertly observe each group spent waiting to see among the passengers;
10 - I do not need to look up to see the sky, I just look at your eyes. 
10 things that changed since I saw you come to my table and said "WOW"
1 - I'm not so aware of what my friends, my schedule is free, just in case;
2 - leave me your thoughts INFLUENCE;
3 - My sweet nightmares become dreams (inevitable);
4 - I can not control my words
5 - Do not fear looking like a fool in front of others;
6 - Some songs remind me of you, even if you have memories of you;
7 - I am more aware of my cell;
8 - My watch does not mark the hours;
9 - covertly observe each group spent waiting to see among the passengers;
10 - I do not need to look up to see the sky, I just look at your eyes.
Monday, September 20, 2010
Couch Colors For Dark Wood Floors
The super-athlete
Jacobus Franciscus "Jim" Thorpe, born on May 28, 1888 on an Indian reservation in the state of Oklahoma, has been one of the most comprehensive sports history, as well as master almost all types of athletic playing high level baseball, basketball, lacrosse and football. Although the latter was his favorite sport, and that was unveiled in his native country, was athletics that gave him worldwide fame.
native of Sac and Fox tribe , descended from the mother of Black Hawk (Black Hawk), the great chief of the mythical tribe, was the tribal name Wa Tho Huk (Bright Path), because the intense sunlight illuminating the path leading to the hut where he was born. Little Jim soon stood out for its exceptional faculty. He spent the first years of his life working with his father, running, hunting and fishing as a child of nature , which probably was the best "training" to an athlete as complete as it became.
The first steps of his career gave the boarding school of Indian Carlisle College in Pennsylvania, an institution dedicated to teaching Indian children which he joined at age 16. The death of his father takes him out of school, going to work for a couple of years on a farm. However, the young Jim missed the school environment and the intense sports activity developed there (football, baseball, athletics, basketball, lacrosse ...), so in 1907 decided to return to Carslile.
Equipped with a natural talent for sport and an impressive physique that aunaba strength, agility, speed and endurance (1.83 meters and 80 kilos of adult), his first interest went to the football, until One day his athletic ability caught the attention the prestigious Pop Warner coach , who took him under his wing and brought him become a complete athlete.
The most complete athlete
In the following years the sports progression Jim was brilliant. It was already a leader, and he led the "Indians" of Carlisle achieve great notoriety around the country, coming to win the national title in football. He was elected twice to the All-American , a national team of the best amateur players each season. "No one can stop it," he said of Pop Warner.
In the spring of 1912, including athletic accomplishments, get three firsts, two seconds and a third in college athletics championship against the University of Pennsylvania champion. age of 24, set as one of the greatest athletes of the moment, the Stockholm 1912 Olympic Games should be the ultimate test of athletic ability. and exceed the test with flying colors.
In those games were introduced for the first time the combined events pentathlon (long jump, javelin, 200 meters, discus and 1,500 meters) and decathlon (with the same disciplines as today, but then disputed in three days). In both, Thorpe wins with overwhelming superiority. In the pentathlon wins in four of the five tests, in the decathlon, four of the ten, setting a new world and Olympic record. His 8,412 points, corresponding to 7,232 according to the current scoreboard is a spectacular brand for the time and it would take 16 years to be whipped. Also, participate in the high jump final, where he finished fourth with a mark of 1.87 - and in the long jump (seventh with 6.89). "Allow me, to congratulate you. Are you the most amazing athlete who has ever seen, "said the King Gustav V of Sweden.
Stockholm Games Upon returning to his country as a hero, even starring in a traditional stop on Broadway in an open carriage reserved for very prominent people and events . Another great football season ends, being elected for the third time All-American, and in January 1913 he married his girlfriend Iva Miller. All are successful, life smiles ... but fate has in store, once again, a bad move.
Indictment of professionalism
Months later, a newspaper published in the summers of 1909 and 1910 had taken a salary $ 70 monthly for a small team of American League baseball. At that time, the amateur status involved an absolute prohibition of any form of compensation, so it was normal after the season of many university athletic registered with false names to play a few months in the professional leagues and earn money . Jim but also did not hide his identity, believing it did not contravene any rules. That would cost him dearly ingenuity.
After investigating the case, Amateur Athletic Union (AAU) of the United States deprived it of its status as amateur athlete, and the Committee International Olympic Committee (IOC) decided to strip him of his medals, while his name and his records disappeared from all official classifications. Athletes who had been second in both tests (the Norwegian and Swedish Ferdinand Bie Hugo Wislander) refused to receive the gold medals Thorpe had to return as a gesture of admiration for him. The medals were kept for decades in the Olympic Museum in Lausanne. Bitter
Olympic disqualification after that he always considered unfair, Jim Thorpe, appointed by the American press as the best national athlete of the first quarter of the century, tried his hand at other sports, playing with success in the legendary New York Giants football league. Later, he joined other teams in football and baseball until his retirement in 1928. If for nearly a decade and succulent vintage sporting successes economic contracts, his last years as a professional athlete are marked by a succession of failures motivated by his many personal problems.
Jim Thorpe was not an easy personal life, repeatedly marked by tragedy and adversity. When he was eight years his twin brother died of meningitis, he was orphaned of both parents before the age of 18, his first child (he had eight) died in an influenza epidemic, divorced twice ... A list of adversities to which we must also add that it was the victim of racial discrimination because of his Indian roots, discrimination of which he was fully aware and against which always rebelled.
A life full of adversity
The death of his first son was plunged into a deep depression. Already serious and reserved, he was still bitter over the character and start binge drinking. Disagreements with his wife becomes more common, which leads to divorce, and starts to neglect logical training with the drop in athletic performance.
The Giants rescinded their contract, and from there began a period of continuous changes in equipment, and even times when he has a hard time finding a computer to keep playing, getting to spend calamities. After retiring, ruined and in crisis by the Great Depression - just doing all kinds of jobs to support his family : construction worker, as a porter at the docks, nightclub doorman, security guard, and even makes the movie extra in several films, primarily characterized by great Indian chief. However, your personal situation does not improve, the jobs did not last long and much of what he earns he spends in pubs.
Sunk into oblivion for years, is hospitalized in 1950, charitable, to be treated for oral cancer. A year later, a movie came to restore and enhance your figure. Directed by Michael Curtiz and Burt Lancaster give life to the athlete, Jim Thorpe: All American (1951) tells his life story and sports, and all the obstacles he had to overcome to become a sporting legend. One of the most emotional scenes includes an episode in 1932 during the celebration of the Olympic Games in Los Angeles. The idol of the masses once roam the near the Olympic stadium with no money to pay the entrance, when it is recognized by some spectators that take you to the VIP, which is acclaimed by the audience that crowded the Coliseum.
Jim Thorpe died on March 28, 1953 surrounded by his seven children and his third wife, dying of cancer, poor, alcoholic, without having been restored to its "Olympic honor", something that would not happen until 1982. Seven decades later of his exploits, the then IOC president Juan Antonio Samaranch, was given to his heirs of two gold medals that were withdrawn . Jim Thorpe, the red that astonished the world in 1912, "the most wonderful athlete who has ever seen, "recovering well, officially, the recognition of some Olympic titles should never have lost.
was the first great athlete of the twentieth century, a force of nature, the sportsman who excelled at all forms. After amazing the world in the 1912 Stockholm Games, winning two combined events (pentathlon and decathlon), was accused of professionalism and stripped of his Olympic medals. This is the peculiar history of the Red Indian Jim Thorpe.
Jacobus Franciscus "Jim" Thorpe, born on May 28, 1888 on an Indian reservation in the state of Oklahoma, has been one of the most comprehensive sports history, as well as master almost all types of athletic playing high level baseball, basketball, lacrosse and football. Although the latter was his favorite sport, and that was unveiled in his native country, was athletics that gave him worldwide fame.
native of Sac and Fox tribe , descended from the mother of Black Hawk (Black Hawk), the great chief of the mythical tribe, was the tribal name Wa Tho Huk (Bright Path), because the intense sunlight illuminating the path leading to the hut where he was born. Little Jim soon stood out for its exceptional faculty. He spent the first years of his life working with his father, running, hunting and fishing as a child of nature , which probably was the best "training" to an athlete as complete as it became.
The first steps of his career gave the boarding school of Indian Carlisle College in Pennsylvania, an institution dedicated to teaching Indian children which he joined at age 16. The death of his father takes him out of school, going to work for a couple of years on a farm. However, the young Jim missed the school environment and the intense sports activity developed there (football, baseball, athletics, basketball, lacrosse ...), so in 1907 decided to return to Carslile.
Equipped with a natural talent for sport and an impressive physique that aunaba strength, agility, speed and endurance (1.83 meters and 80 kilos of adult), his first interest went to the football, until One day his athletic ability caught the attention the prestigious Pop Warner coach , who took him under his wing and brought him become a complete athlete.
The most complete athlete
In the following years the sports progression Jim was brilliant. It was already a leader, and he led the "Indians" of Carlisle achieve great notoriety around the country, coming to win the national title in football. He was elected twice to the All-American , a national team of the best amateur players each season. "No one can stop it," he said of Pop Warner.
In the spring of 1912, including athletic accomplishments, get three firsts, two seconds and a third in college athletics championship against the University of Pennsylvania champion. age of 24, set as one of the greatest athletes of the moment, the Stockholm 1912 Olympic Games should be the ultimate test of athletic ability. and exceed the test with flying colors.
In those games were introduced for the first time the combined events pentathlon (long jump, javelin, 200 meters, discus and 1,500 meters) and decathlon (with the same disciplines as today, but then disputed in three days). In both, Thorpe wins with overwhelming superiority. In the pentathlon wins in four of the five tests, in the decathlon, four of the ten, setting a new world and Olympic record. His 8,412 points, corresponding to 7,232 according to the current scoreboard is a spectacular brand for the time and it would take 16 years to be whipped. Also, participate in the high jump final, where he finished fourth with a mark of 1.87 - and in the long jump (seventh with 6.89). "Allow me, to congratulate you. Are you the most amazing athlete who has ever seen, "said the King Gustav V of Sweden.
Stockholm Games Upon returning to his country as a hero, even starring in a traditional stop on Broadway in an open carriage reserved for very prominent people and events . Another great football season ends, being elected for the third time All-American, and in January 1913 he married his girlfriend Iva Miller. All are successful, life smiles ... but fate has in store, once again, a bad move.
Indictment of professionalism
Months later, a newspaper published in the summers of 1909 and 1910 had taken a salary $ 70 monthly for a small team of American League baseball. At that time, the amateur status involved an absolute prohibition of any form of compensation, so it was normal after the season of many university athletic registered with false names to play a few months in the professional leagues and earn money . Jim but also did not hide his identity, believing it did not contravene any rules. That would cost him dearly ingenuity.
After investigating the case, Amateur Athletic Union (AAU) of the United States deprived it of its status as amateur athlete, and the Committee International Olympic Committee (IOC) decided to strip him of his medals, while his name and his records disappeared from all official classifications. Athletes who had been second in both tests (the Norwegian and Swedish Ferdinand Bie Hugo Wislander) refused to receive the gold medals Thorpe had to return as a gesture of admiration for him. The medals were kept for decades in the Olympic Museum in Lausanne. Bitter
Olympic disqualification after that he always considered unfair, Jim Thorpe, appointed by the American press as the best national athlete of the first quarter of the century, tried his hand at other sports, playing with success in the legendary New York Giants football league. Later, he joined other teams in football and baseball until his retirement in 1928. If for nearly a decade and succulent vintage sporting successes economic contracts, his last years as a professional athlete are marked by a succession of failures motivated by his many personal problems.
Jim Thorpe was not an easy personal life, repeatedly marked by tragedy and adversity. When he was eight years his twin brother died of meningitis, he was orphaned of both parents before the age of 18, his first child (he had eight) died in an influenza epidemic, divorced twice ... A list of adversities to which we must also add that it was the victim of racial discrimination because of his Indian roots, discrimination of which he was fully aware and against which always rebelled.
A life full of adversity
The death of his first son was plunged into a deep depression. Already serious and reserved, he was still bitter over the character and start binge drinking. Disagreements with his wife becomes more common, which leads to divorce, and starts to neglect logical training with the drop in athletic performance.
The Giants rescinded their contract, and from there began a period of continuous changes in equipment, and even times when he has a hard time finding a computer to keep playing, getting to spend calamities. After retiring, ruined and in crisis by the Great Depression - just doing all kinds of jobs to support his family : construction worker, as a porter at the docks, nightclub doorman, security guard, and even makes the movie extra in several films, primarily characterized by great Indian chief. However, your personal situation does not improve, the jobs did not last long and much of what he earns he spends in pubs.
Sunk into oblivion for years, is hospitalized in 1950, charitable, to be treated for oral cancer. A year later, a movie came to restore and enhance your figure. Directed by Michael Curtiz and Burt Lancaster give life to the athlete, Jim Thorpe: All American (1951) tells his life story and sports, and all the obstacles he had to overcome to become a sporting legend. One of the most emotional scenes includes an episode in 1932 during the celebration of the Olympic Games in Los Angeles. The idol of the masses once roam the near the Olympic stadium with no money to pay the entrance, when it is recognized by some spectators that take you to the VIP, which is acclaimed by the audience that crowded the Coliseum.
Jim Thorpe died on March 28, 1953 surrounded by his seven children and his third wife, dying of cancer, poor, alcoholic, without having been restored to its "Olympic honor", something that would not happen until 1982. Seven decades later of his exploits, the then IOC president Juan Antonio Samaranch, was given to his heirs of two gold medals that were withdrawn . Jim Thorpe, the red that astonished the world in 1912, "the most wonderful athlete who has ever seen, "recovering well, officially, the recognition of some Olympic titles should never have lost.
Sunday, September 12, 2010
What Will Cause A Miscarriage
When hatred awake.
Four Christmases ago, I wrote this text. I remember I liked to write things in this style, but because it is "mine" I never paid enough attention. So before I will take from my papers, chooses to publish it here. I apologize for this poorly written, but I decided not to edit it and copy it as is the original of those days. Another memory but was written with much anger. Hope you can enjoy something.
When Hatred stirs the flowers were extinguished
are confused feelings and thoughts are silent.
When a world falls
There is a Hercules being caught
Slope
is cruel and does not play death playoff.
life How many times has he won?
is not the weight of its kind
not my soul that lies
Are your eyes that exude
envy and hatred permanently. Product
love a night of unknown
unclean Early separation objectives.
coming to me saying that nothing matters
How cruel divine punishment awaits you at the door of the unknown.
I ask you to love me or want me
Fiera hyena, do not laugh
Why are you crying on the inside
Where your wound bleeds. Something
next turn connects to
not stop its progress, do not mess with destiny.
When a life never rises
falls into an abyss of creation are angels
Pure divine beings. Small
be in your mother
I see your eyes and you see mine.
I feel in my arms. Imre
and return your smile.
I know that life is worthwhile.
I want to make your life a celebration. You are blood of my veins.
When hate waking
No one stops it
His death is also yours. There
convictions. There is no love
As the mother of a child.
You're not death!
I ask you to dream with me
Solo
understand is that my life is a seed future
And my friend, my son.
only one God for many souls, a soul
only so many Devils.
Son, not as you are ...
But I love you.
And when my time comes I will hold
, strong enough to bring down the stars ...
And I'll see your face for the first time
And I'll say: Where the Hatred stirs
not know,
behind him, life is endless.
Lo Cascio (2006) 
Four Christmases ago, I wrote this text. I remember I liked to write things in this style, but because it is "mine" I never paid enough attention. So before I will take from my papers, chooses to publish it here. I apologize for this poorly written, but I decided not to edit it and copy it as is the original of those days. Another memory but was written with much anger. Hope you can enjoy something.
When Hatred stirs the flowers were extinguished
are confused feelings and thoughts are silent.
When a world falls
There is a Hercules being caught
Slope
is cruel and does not play death playoff.
life How many times has he won?
is not the weight of its kind
not my soul that lies
Are your eyes that exude
envy and hatred permanently. Product
love a night of unknown
unclean Early separation objectives.
coming to me saying that nothing matters
How cruel divine punishment awaits you at the door of the unknown.
I ask you to love me or want me
Fiera hyena, do not laugh
Why are you crying on the inside
Where your wound bleeds. Something
next turn connects to
not stop its progress, do not mess with destiny.
When a life never rises
falls into an abyss of creation are angels
Pure divine beings. Small
be in your mother
I see your eyes and you see mine.
I feel in my arms. Imre
and return your smile.
I know that life is worthwhile.
I want to make your life a celebration. You are blood of my veins.
When hate waking
No one stops it
His death is also yours. There
convictions. There is no love
As the mother of a child.
You're not death!
I ask you to dream with me
Solo
understand is that my life is a seed future
And my friend, my son.
only one God for many souls, a soul
only so many Devils.
Son, not as you are ...
But I love you.
And when my time comes I will hold
, strong enough to bring down the stars ...
And I'll see your face for the first time
And I'll say: Where the Hatred stirs
not know,
behind him, life is endless.
Lo Cascio (2006)
Sunday, August 15, 2010
Mw2 Russian To English Fix
dethroned
whole life summed up in their sentences. Because up to that George Best was a genius. "Throughout my life I spent much money on alcohol, women and cars. The rest I just squandered, "he once said. So he was: honest, carefree, extravagant ... a parasite. However, his talent on a football field was huge, comparable only to that of the best ever (Maradona, Pele, Cruyff ...) The mischief he did with the ball, stitched boots, up comments yet admiration. "George Best was unique," said Sir Alex Ferguson. Your life too.
pop icon's first football
George Best was born on May 22, 1946 in Belfast (Northern Ireland) in a family of six children. Since his youth he devoted most of his free time to sports, rugby at first and then football. Missing even more of a class to spend more hours at his real hobby. His father did not want to devote to this sport, but as a good rebel was that did not only increase their desire to be a footballer. He started playing in his hometown team, the Cregagh, and soon proved to be a prodigy with the ball at his feet. Best 
For a decade amazed the world with his football genius. Then, tired of the dynamics of professionalism, decided to retire, play for amateur teams to the limit and enjoy the pleasures of life. Alcohol drowned the most talented football ever emerged in the British Isles. Rebellious, talented, genuine, Gulf ... That was George; Simply the Best.
whole life summed up in their sentences. Because up to that George Best was a genius. "Throughout my life I spent much money on alcohol, women and cars. The rest I just squandered, "he once said. So he was: honest, carefree, extravagant ... a parasite. However, his talent on a football field was huge, comparable only to that of the best ever (Maradona, Pele, Cruyff ...) The mischief he did with the ball, stitched boots, up comments yet admiration. "George Best was unique," said Sir Alex Ferguson. Your life too.
offered the world six magical seasons, then choked her star faded for the excesses. Between 1964 and 1970 football world marveled. There was nobody like him there is no one like him . In those years he won two English league (1965 and 1967), a European Cup (1968), the Golden Ball (1968) and a Bronze Ball (1970). In those years, scored 115 goals in 290 games and left to remember countless displays of his talent.
One night in Lisbon, in 1966, undertook to destroy Eusebio Benfica (1-5). The next day the Portuguese press, delivered to such an exhibition, put his nickname accompany the rest of his life: "The Fifth Beatle." Also unforgettable was his match against the selection of Scotland, in October 1967, after which the public dubbed him "the best" ( the best ). And that time that made her blush when veteran goalkeeper Gordon Banks in England, Ireland, slyly removing the ball when he went out the door, to mark his head (but ultimately the goal is not earned).
was the first pop icon of the modern game, as star in and outside the playing fields. And then, while waning Best player, Best character grew, the Best cartoon Best of the excesses . Like that time that, according to later recall the buttons on one of the most exclusive hotels in New York, came to ask, one after another, dozens of bottles of champagne to spend the 20,000 pounds that were scattered on the bed in the luxurious suite in which he enjoyed with a former Miss Universe.
quotations Your
"is the best in the world," Pele said of him in the late 60's. "Had he been born ugly, you would not have heard of Pele, Best once said. But he was not born ugly, but attractive, friendly, binge and over-sensitive to the pleasures of life. And ended up lost on the road. And ended up losing the least you need a player to play the best.
"is the best in the world," Pele said of him in the late 60's. "Had he been born ugly, you would not have heard of Pele, Best once said. But he was not born ugly, but attractive, friendly, binge and over-sensitive to the pleasures of life. And ended up lost on the road. And ended up losing the least you need a player to play the best.
At that time, George Best was portrayed, without shame, for your words, as ingenious and silly as devastating and dramatic. It was pure dynamite with a microphone in front : "They say I slept with seven Miss Universe. It's a lie, have only been three "..." In 1969 I left the women and alcohol were the worst 20 minutes of my life "..." I stopped drinking, but only when I sleep "..." I had a house on the coast, but to reach it had to go through a bar. I never got to see the sea "..." Every time I enter a site, there are 70 people who want to invite me to drink, and I can not say no "..." I was born with a great gift that often has a destructive side. He wanted to outdo everyone when I played and the way he wanted to beat everyone in my nights out. "
All of these phrases, and more, perfectly describe the character. All of them portray that might have been, if he wanted one of two or three best players in history. Best was the greatest wasted talent in world football. But those years of football (his good years) have not ever seen again. So yes, it was Simply the best.
pop icon's first football
George Best was born on May 22, 1946 in Belfast (Northern Ireland) in a family of six children. Since his youth he devoted most of his free time to sports, rugby at first and then football. Missing even more of a class to spend more hours at his real hobby. His father did not want to devote to this sport, but as a good rebel was that did not only increase their desire to be a footballer. He started playing in his hometown team, the Cregagh, and soon proved to be a prodigy with the ball at his feet. Best
When he was 15, Sir Matt Busby, the legendary coach of Manchester United, received a call from one of his scouts, "I just found a talent," and two years later, he was playing in first division with the Reds . From the very day of its debut, Busby realized he had fallen a genius in his hands. Went crazy that day his marker, Graham Williams, an experienced central West Bromwich Albion. Months after they met and told Williams: "Can I stay a moment to see your face?". "Why what? "asked Best. "Because until now the only thing he saw was your ass glued to the band disappear." He agreed that
Manchester with great players like Bobby Charlton and Dennis Law. His arrival the team was a revolution, the young George Best was hungry for football and showed an impeccable attitude: "I could play with either foot, scored goals, many of them head. Busby said of me that was the best at challenging for the ball-remembered years later. He worked hard on the field, retreated to defend if needed. If he lost the ball was a personal insult and wanted back. Yes sir, bothered me a lot to me removed because it was my ball. " Fascinated the world with a football power, full speed, flooding, skill, and nerve attached. fragile in appearance, had an excellent technique with both legs, a blistering pace, dribbling and great vision magical game . Old Trafford fans went crazy with his game and his goals. "If football is an art, then I am an artist," he once said.
Harder They Fall
With the network achieves in those years a number of successes, but it was the victory in the 1968 European Cup (4-1 to Benfica in the final with a best in Star Plan), which elevates the boy from Belfast to major star status media. So each week he received thousands of letters from his fans. But once on top of world football was unable to absorb success and lover of life over night, was in for a path of self destruction . Also contributed to this team this year out of Matt Busby, the veteran coach who had guided with a firm hand, as if it were a father-to that group of players.
With the network achieves in those years a number of successes, but it was the victory in the 1968 European Cup (4-1 to Benfica in the final with a best in Star Plan), which elevates the boy from Belfast to major star status media. So each week he received thousands of letters from his fans. But once on top of world football was unable to absorb success and lover of life over night, was in for a path of self destruction . Also contributed to this team this year out of Matt Busby, the veteran coach who had guided with a firm hand, as if it were a father-to that group of players.
On February 7, 1970 achieved another milestone in his career by scoring six goals in a Premiership match in which Manchester Golea 2-8 to Northampton. But then took a while flirting with alcohol and drugs, which led him to suffer a sharp decline in athletic performance. Without having reached 25, his best years as a player had passed.
George Best was at Manchester until 1974, when it decides to abandon the elite football teams play for children and even amateurs. Played for Fulham FC in three American League teams (one season he scored 15 goals in 24 games), and Scottish and Irish League, always second-rate equipment. Although there completely lost fitness still offered, from time to time some glimpses of his magic . As impressive as that marked playing for the San Jose Earthquakes in 1981, and was considered the best goal scored ever in the NASL (the now defunct North American Soccer League).
late 1982 by the AFBornemouth tab, computer English Third Division, where he played until the end of the season. Then aged 37, decided to retire from football. It would still have one last encounter with the sport that gave him fame. It was in November 2004, being already very ill when he accepted the job as coach of the youth ranks at Portsmouth. Was charge more symbolic than effective, but this way fulfilled his wish of getting back together, at the end of his days, the world of football.
A life full speed
alcohol, beautiful women and speed were a constant in his life. Being young and a winner all seemed fine. As soon as they left the sport's elite, his life became a hell, including a suicide attempt. Despite his success with women, his love life was a big failure, twice married and twice divorced, receiving harsh accusations from their wives : "When drunk George is the most deplorable, donkey, ignorant piece of shit I've seen, "said one of them. In 1984 he was sentenced to three months in prison for driving drunk and assaulting the police officer who stopped him. He spent Christmas of that year behind bars. Twenty years later he repeated the scene and pulled the driver's license for 20 months.
alcohol, beautiful women and speed were a constant in his life. Being young and a winner all seemed fine. As soon as they left the sport's elite, his life became a hell, including a suicide attempt. Despite his success with women, his love life was a big failure, twice married and twice divorced, receiving harsh accusations from their wives : "When drunk George is the most deplorable, donkey, ignorant piece of shit I've seen, "said one of them. In 1984 he was sentenced to three months in prison for driving drunk and assaulting the police officer who stopped him. He spent Christmas of that year behind bars. Twenty years later he repeated the scene and pulled the driver's license for 20 months.
In September 1990 she starred in another ugly incident in a BBC television show. Best appeared with obvious signs of intoxication and snapped live presenter: " Terry, I like screwing " ("Terry, I like to fuck"). Subsequently apologized and confessed that he had been one of the worst incidents arising from his alcoholism. The last years of his life were a nightmare of hospitals and operations. In 2000 came close to death by her suffering serious liver damage, a year later he was hospitalized for pneumonia, and in 2002 he underwent a liver transplant, and the November 25, 2005 died without having fulfilled 60 as a result of internal bleeding.
few days before his death, the newspaper asked Best News of the World to publish a photo of him lying in bed showing her delicate, accompanied by the following message: "Do not die like me." Thus did warn everyone of the devastating effects of alcoholism. Nevertheless, at the end of his days he was proud of some of the things he had achieved: "Pele told me that I was the best player in the world. That's the best tribute to my life. "
Video tribute to George Best
Wednesday, July 28, 2010
Aircast For Ligament Surgery
Manual for children. - Gabriel Garcia Marquez
these reflections I aspire to be a handbook for kids to dare to defend themselves from adults in learning the arts and letters. They have no basis scientific but emotional or sentimental, if you will, and are based on an unlikely premise: if a child is placed against a range of different toys, you'll end up staying with one you like more. I think that choice is not accidental, but reveals in the child a vocation and a skill that would perhaps unnoticed by unsuspecting parents and teachers tired.
I think both will come to birth, and it would be important to identify in time and take them into account to help you choose your profession. Moreover, I believe that some children at a certain age, and under certain conditions, have powers that allow them to see defects beyond the reality admitted by adults. Could be remnants of some power of divination that the human race sold out in previous stages, or extraordinary events almost clairvoyant intuition of artists during the solitude of growth, and disappear, like the thymus gland, when no longer needed. I think
born writer, painter or musician. It holds out the prospect and in many cases the physical conditions for dance and theater, and a suitable talent for journalism, understood as a literary genre, and the cinema as a synthesis of fiction and plastic. In this sense I am a Platonist: learning is remembering. This means that when a child reaches the primary school may be already predisposed by nature to any of these trades, but still do not know. And maybe not ever know, but his fate may be better if someone helps you find out. Not to force it in any way, but to create you and encourage conditions favorable to enjoy without fear of their favorite toy. I believe with absolute seriousness, to do always what one likes, and that alone is the master formula for a long and happy life.
To support this blithe assumption I have no other basis than the stubborn and difficult experience of having learned the craft as a writer against an adverse environment, not only outside the formal education but against it, but from two conditions with no means a well-defined aptitude and vocation landslide. Nothing would please me more if the solitary adventure might have some useful not only for learning the craft of literature, but for all the offices of the arts.
vocation without a gift and the gift without calling
Georges Bernanos, French Catholic writer, said: "Every vocation is a calling." The Dictionary of Authorities, which was the first of the Royal Academy in 1726, defined as "the inspiration that God calls a state of perfection." It was, of course, a generalization from religious vocations. Fitness, as the same dictionary, is "the ability and ease and way to do something." Two and a half centuries later, the Dictionary of the Royal Academy retains these definitions with minimal retouching. What it says is that a clear vocation and assumed depth becomes insatiable, eternal, and resistant to any opposing force: the only provision of the spirit can defeat love.
The skills are often accompanied by physical attributes. If they are singing the same musical note several children, about the exact repeat, some do not. Music teachers say the first they have what is called the primary ear, which is important for musicians. Antonio Sarasate, four years, came with his violin toy a note that his father, a great virtuoso, he could not find yours. Whenever there is a risk, however, that adults kill such virtues because they do not seem paramount, and end up typecast their children in the reality that parents walled them in boxes. The rigor of many parents with children is often the same artists dealing with gay children.
The skills and vocations do not always come together. Hence the disaster sublime voices of singers who do not go anywhere because of lack of trial, or painters who sacrificed a lifetime to a profession wrong, or prolific writers who have nothing to say. Only when the two come together there is a chance of something happening, but not by magic, still lack the discipline, study, technique and power to overcome for a lifetime. For the narrators
is a test that does not fail. If you ask a group of people of any age who have a movie, the results are revealing. Some give their impressions emotional, political or philosophical, but know not tell the whole story and in order. Others tell the story, as detailed as you remember, with the assurance that it will be enough to convey the emotion of the original. The first may have a bright future in any subject, divine or human, but are not narrators. A second lack is still much to be "culturally based technique, style, mental rigor, but they can be. Ie: there are those who can tell a story from beginning to speak, and some people will never know. In children is a test worth taking seriously.
The advantages of not obeying parents
The survey conducted for these reflections has shown that in Colombia there are no established systems for early detection and early vocation skills as a starting point for an artistic career from the cradle to the grave. Parents are not ready for a serious responsibility to identify in time, and while so are to antagonize her. The less drastic they intend to pursue a career children safe, and preserve the art for entertainment in spare time. Fortunately for humanity, the kids do little if the parents in a grave matter, and less on what to do with the future.
So those who have vocations misleading to assume attitudes hidden away with it. There are those who do not perform well in school because they do not like what they study, and yet could excel in what they like if someone would help. But it can also be obtaining good grades, not because they like school, but that their parents and teachers do not force them to leave a favorite toy that are hidden in the heart. It is also true drama of having to sit on the piano during recess or aptitude or vocation, imposing only parents. A good music teacher, shocked by the wickedness of the method, said that the piano should be taken into the house, but not for children to study it by force, but to play with him.
parents if we want our children to be better than us, but do not always know how. Neither the children of families of artists are safe from this uncertainty. In some cases, because parents want them to be artists like them, and children have a distinct vocation. In others, because the parents did mal en las artes, y quieren preservar de una suerte igual aun a los hijos cuya vocación indudable son las artes. No es menor el riesgo de los niños de familias ajenas a las artes, cuyos padres quisieran empezar una estirpe que sea lo que ellos no pudieron. En el extremo opuesto no faltan los niños contrariados que aprenden el instrumento a escondidas, y cuando los padres los descubren ya son estrellas de una orquesta de autodidactas.
Maestros y alumnos concuerdan contra los métodos académicos, pero no tienen un criterio común sobre cuál puede ser mejor. La mayoría rechazaron los métodos vigentes, por su carácter rígido y su escasa atención a la creatividad, y prefieren ser empíricos e independientes. Others believe that his fate depended not so much of what they learned in school and the cunning and stubbornness with which mocked the obstacles of parents and teachers. In general, the struggle for survival and lack of incentives have forced the majority to be alone and the brave.
on budgetary criteria differ. But some do not support complete freedom, and others even try to consecrate the absolute empiricism. Those who speak of the discipline does not recognize its usefulness, but thought that arises spontaneously as a result of an internal need, and therefore should not be forced. Others miss the humanistic and theoretical foundations of his art. Others say the theory. The Most, after years of effort, revolt against the prestige and the plight of artists in a society that denies the professional nature of the arts.
However, the harsh voices of the survey were against the school, as an area where poverty of spirit short wings, and is an obstacle to learn anything. And especially for the arts. Think that there has been a waste of talent by the infinite repetition, without alteration of the academic dogma, while only the most gifted and creative might be great when they had to go back to school. "It educates back to art," have told the teachers and students together. They would be pleased to feel which by themselves. Teachers resent, but also admit that they would say. Perhaps it is fairer to say that everyone is right. For both teachers and students, and ultimately the whole society, are victims of an education system that is far from the reality of the country.
So before thinking about art education must be defined as soon as possible a cultural policy that we have never had. Obey to a modern conception of what culture is, what it does, how much, for who is and who is taken into account that arts education is not an end in itself but a means preservation and promotion of regional cultures, whose natural movement is from the periphery to the center and bottom to top.
is not the same artistic teaching art education. This is a social function and taught math or science should be taught at primary school in the appreciation and enjoyment of the arts and letters. Art education, however, is a career specialist for students with specific skills and vocations, which aims to train artists and art teachers as professionals.
not wait to get vocations: we have to go out and find. They are everywhere, more The more pure forgotten. They are the ones that support the eternal life of street music, painting and brush early in the municipal Sapolin, raw poetry of the bars, the overwhelming flood of popular culture who is the father and the mother of all the arts.
What eat the letters?
Colombians, has always seen us as a country of lawyers. Perhaps this is due to the high school programs do more emphasis on literature in the other arts. But apart from the chronological memory of authors and works, the students are not cultivated the habit of reading, but force them to read and do synopsis books written programmed. Everywhere I meet professionals scalded by the books they forced to read in school with the same pleasure with which they drank castor oil. For synopsis, unfortunately, had no problems, because ads found in newspapers like this: "Change synopsis of Don Quixote by synopsis of The Odyssey." That's right: in Colombia there is a market so prosperous and so intense traffic photostatic summaries that we put together best business writers do not write the original books but once writing the synopses for high school. Is this method of teaching rather than television and bad books, "which is destroying the habit reading. I agree that good literature course can only be a gem for readers. But it is impossible for children to read a novel, write synopsis and prepare a reflective statement for the following Tuesday. Ideally, a child devote part of their weekend to read a book as far as possible and as far as you like, which is the only condition to read a book, but it is criminal, for himself and for the book, which read to the force in your hours of play and with the anguish of the other tasks.
would take "as needed even for all the arts-a special band with high school literature classes that only pretend to be smart guides reading and reflection to become good readers. For train writers is another story. No one taught to write, but good books, read with the aptitude and vocation alerts. Work experience is how little an established writer can convey to the trainees if they still have a minimum of humility to believe that someone may know more than them. For that we would not need a college, but practical and participative workshops, where craftsmen writers discuss with students the carpentry trade: how they took their arguments, how they imagined their characters, how they solved their technical problems of structure, style, tone, which is the only individual that can sometimes drawn in clean great mystery of creation. The same set of workshops is already proven for some genres of journalism, film and television, and in particular stories and screenplays. And without tests or qualifications or anything. That life decide who serves and who does not work, as happens anyway.
What to ask for Colombia, however, is not only a change in form and substance in the schools of art, but art education is provided within an autonomous system that depends on an organization's own culture and not the Ministry of Education. That is not centralized, but rather, it is the coordinator of cultural development from the different regions, because each culture has its own personality, its history, its traditions, its language, its own artistic expressions. That starts with educating parents and teachers in the early assessment of the inclinations of children, and prepare for a school that preserves their natural curiosity and creativity. All this, of course, without many illusions. Anyway, if by art, which must be already are. Even if you do not ever know. 
these reflections I aspire to be a handbook for kids to dare to defend themselves from adults in learning the arts and letters. They have no basis scientific but emotional or sentimental, if you will, and are based on an unlikely premise: if a child is placed against a range of different toys, you'll end up staying with one you like more. I think that choice is not accidental, but reveals in the child a vocation and a skill that would perhaps unnoticed by unsuspecting parents and teachers tired.
I think both will come to birth, and it would be important to identify in time and take them into account to help you choose your profession. Moreover, I believe that some children at a certain age, and under certain conditions, have powers that allow them to see defects beyond the reality admitted by adults. Could be remnants of some power of divination that the human race sold out in previous stages, or extraordinary events almost clairvoyant intuition of artists during the solitude of growth, and disappear, like the thymus gland, when no longer needed. I think
born writer, painter or musician. It holds out the prospect and in many cases the physical conditions for dance and theater, and a suitable talent for journalism, understood as a literary genre, and the cinema as a synthesis of fiction and plastic. In this sense I am a Platonist: learning is remembering. This means that when a child reaches the primary school may be already predisposed by nature to any of these trades, but still do not know. And maybe not ever know, but his fate may be better if someone helps you find out. Not to force it in any way, but to create you and encourage conditions favorable to enjoy without fear of their favorite toy. I believe with absolute seriousness, to do always what one likes, and that alone is the master formula for a long and happy life.
To support this blithe assumption I have no other basis than the stubborn and difficult experience of having learned the craft as a writer against an adverse environment, not only outside the formal education but against it, but from two conditions with no means a well-defined aptitude and vocation landslide. Nothing would please me more if the solitary adventure might have some useful not only for learning the craft of literature, but for all the offices of the arts.
vocation without a gift and the gift without calling
Georges Bernanos, French Catholic writer, said: "Every vocation is a calling." The Dictionary of Authorities, which was the first of the Royal Academy in 1726, defined as "the inspiration that God calls a state of perfection." It was, of course, a generalization from religious vocations. Fitness, as the same dictionary, is "the ability and ease and way to do something." Two and a half centuries later, the Dictionary of the Royal Academy retains these definitions with minimal retouching. What it says is that a clear vocation and assumed depth becomes insatiable, eternal, and resistant to any opposing force: the only provision of the spirit can defeat love.
The skills are often accompanied by physical attributes. If they are singing the same musical note several children, about the exact repeat, some do not. Music teachers say the first they have what is called the primary ear, which is important for musicians. Antonio Sarasate, four years, came with his violin toy a note that his father, a great virtuoso, he could not find yours. Whenever there is a risk, however, that adults kill such virtues because they do not seem paramount, and end up typecast their children in the reality that parents walled them in boxes. The rigor of many parents with children is often the same artists dealing with gay children.
The skills and vocations do not always come together. Hence the disaster sublime voices of singers who do not go anywhere because of lack of trial, or painters who sacrificed a lifetime to a profession wrong, or prolific writers who have nothing to say. Only when the two come together there is a chance of something happening, but not by magic, still lack the discipline, study, technique and power to overcome for a lifetime. For the narrators
is a test that does not fail. If you ask a group of people of any age who have a movie, the results are revealing. Some give their impressions emotional, political or philosophical, but know not tell the whole story and in order. Others tell the story, as detailed as you remember, with the assurance that it will be enough to convey the emotion of the original. The first may have a bright future in any subject, divine or human, but are not narrators. A second lack is still much to be "culturally based technique, style, mental rigor, but they can be. Ie: there are those who can tell a story from beginning to speak, and some people will never know. In children is a test worth taking seriously.
The advantages of not obeying parents
The survey conducted for these reflections has shown that in Colombia there are no established systems for early detection and early vocation skills as a starting point for an artistic career from the cradle to the grave. Parents are not ready for a serious responsibility to identify in time, and while so are to antagonize her. The less drastic they intend to pursue a career children safe, and preserve the art for entertainment in spare time. Fortunately for humanity, the kids do little if the parents in a grave matter, and less on what to do with the future.
So those who have vocations misleading to assume attitudes hidden away with it. There are those who do not perform well in school because they do not like what they study, and yet could excel in what they like if someone would help. But it can also be obtaining good grades, not because they like school, but that their parents and teachers do not force them to leave a favorite toy that are hidden in the heart. It is also true drama of having to sit on the piano during recess or aptitude or vocation, imposing only parents. A good music teacher, shocked by the wickedness of the method, said that the piano should be taken into the house, but not for children to study it by force, but to play with him.
parents if we want our children to be better than us, but do not always know how. Neither the children of families of artists are safe from this uncertainty. In some cases, because parents want them to be artists like them, and children have a distinct vocation. In others, because the parents did mal en las artes, y quieren preservar de una suerte igual aun a los hijos cuya vocación indudable son las artes. No es menor el riesgo de los niños de familias ajenas a las artes, cuyos padres quisieran empezar una estirpe que sea lo que ellos no pudieron. En el extremo opuesto no faltan los niños contrariados que aprenden el instrumento a escondidas, y cuando los padres los descubren ya son estrellas de una orquesta de autodidactas.
Maestros y alumnos concuerdan contra los métodos académicos, pero no tienen un criterio común sobre cuál puede ser mejor. La mayoría rechazaron los métodos vigentes, por su carácter rígido y su escasa atención a la creatividad, y prefieren ser empíricos e independientes. Others believe that his fate depended not so much of what they learned in school and the cunning and stubbornness with which mocked the obstacles of parents and teachers. In general, the struggle for survival and lack of incentives have forced the majority to be alone and the brave.
on budgetary criteria differ. But some do not support complete freedom, and others even try to consecrate the absolute empiricism. Those who speak of the discipline does not recognize its usefulness, but thought that arises spontaneously as a result of an internal need, and therefore should not be forced. Others miss the humanistic and theoretical foundations of his art. Others say the theory. The Most, after years of effort, revolt against the prestige and the plight of artists in a society that denies the professional nature of the arts.
However, the harsh voices of the survey were against the school, as an area where poverty of spirit short wings, and is an obstacle to learn anything. And especially for the arts. Think that there has been a waste of talent by the infinite repetition, without alteration of the academic dogma, while only the most gifted and creative might be great when they had to go back to school. "It educates back to art," have told the teachers and students together. They would be pleased to feel which by themselves. Teachers resent, but also admit that they would say. Perhaps it is fairer to say that everyone is right. For both teachers and students, and ultimately the whole society, are victims of an education system that is far from the reality of the country.
So before thinking about art education must be defined as soon as possible a cultural policy that we have never had. Obey to a modern conception of what culture is, what it does, how much, for who is and who is taken into account that arts education is not an end in itself but a means preservation and promotion of regional cultures, whose natural movement is from the periphery to the center and bottom to top.
is not the same artistic teaching art education. This is a social function and taught math or science should be taught at primary school in the appreciation and enjoyment of the arts and letters. Art education, however, is a career specialist for students with specific skills and vocations, which aims to train artists and art teachers as professionals.
not wait to get vocations: we have to go out and find. They are everywhere, more The more pure forgotten. They are the ones that support the eternal life of street music, painting and brush early in the municipal Sapolin, raw poetry of the bars, the overwhelming flood of popular culture who is the father and the mother of all the arts.
What eat the letters?
Colombians, has always seen us as a country of lawyers. Perhaps this is due to the high school programs do more emphasis on literature in the other arts. But apart from the chronological memory of authors and works, the students are not cultivated the habit of reading, but force them to read and do synopsis books written programmed. Everywhere I meet professionals scalded by the books they forced to read in school with the same pleasure with which they drank castor oil. For synopsis, unfortunately, had no problems, because ads found in newspapers like this: "Change synopsis of Don Quixote by synopsis of The Odyssey." That's right: in Colombia there is a market so prosperous and so intense traffic photostatic summaries that we put together best business writers do not write the original books but once writing the synopses for high school. Is this method of teaching rather than television and bad books, "which is destroying the habit reading. I agree that good literature course can only be a gem for readers. But it is impossible for children to read a novel, write synopsis and prepare a reflective statement for the following Tuesday. Ideally, a child devote part of their weekend to read a book as far as possible and as far as you like, which is the only condition to read a book, but it is criminal, for himself and for the book, which read to the force in your hours of play and with the anguish of the other tasks.
would take "as needed even for all the arts-a special band with high school literature classes that only pretend to be smart guides reading and reflection to become good readers. For train writers is another story. No one taught to write, but good books, read with the aptitude and vocation alerts. Work experience is how little an established writer can convey to the trainees if they still have a minimum of humility to believe that someone may know more than them. For that we would not need a college, but practical and participative workshops, where craftsmen writers discuss with students the carpentry trade: how they took their arguments, how they imagined their characters, how they solved their technical problems of structure, style, tone, which is the only individual that can sometimes drawn in clean great mystery of creation. The same set of workshops is already proven for some genres of journalism, film and television, and in particular stories and screenplays. And without tests or qualifications or anything. That life decide who serves and who does not work, as happens anyway.
What to ask for Colombia, however, is not only a change in form and substance in the schools of art, but art education is provided within an autonomous system that depends on an organization's own culture and not the Ministry of Education. That is not centralized, but rather, it is the coordinator of cultural development from the different regions, because each culture has its own personality, its history, its traditions, its language, its own artistic expressions. That starts with educating parents and teachers in the early assessment of the inclinations of children, and prepare for a school that preserves their natural curiosity and creativity. All this, of course, without many illusions. Anyway, if by art, which must be already are. Even if you do not ever know.
Tuesday, July 27, 2010
Can You Get High Off Skelaxin?
LEONOR Book
I had the honor of presenting the book Leonor Buffo, a young poet disappeared 68 years ago. Poet with my name and I cite in my book, THE HOUSE OF LOVE AND DEATH, which appeared at this house, home, nestled between the mountains, Cabana, beautiful scenery of the Sierras de Córdoba and say
Everything
enmadejado and tied with a thousand threads of love. Leonor
Buffo
Bite silent spaces
words and she ignores him.
The pendulum has turned on its name and each letter naked
the echo that sleeps in his throat - and she does not know-
And his own name, between the slabs of
temple discovers Hidden. Attached to the bones sleeping under gravestones.
to the house, has become
where another woman with her name, for she weaves a web
. Only
dew on the grass at the foot of the mountain, is the crypt,
crying their tears of love
in the belfry.
is through the word Leonor Buffo exists today for us, beyond physical death occurred on September 6, 1941, when he was 23 years. Leonor
Buffo exists in the poetic dimension and she really gives the illusory world that builds from the self, from its own uniqueness.
Language is stripped of superfluous splendors where she is justified as a thinking, as construction of possible worlds, as having the fortune and misfortune. It is in this mirror we see the poet without masks that cover, is true in his poetry is shown as it is, innocent girl still, excited and spontaneous in love and amazed at the time with its load of forgetfulness passes the poems that disentangling in dichotomies where love is:
A dam to harness the wonderful water of life. Not a bit of it to miss-Dice -, which comes from the clouds, and passed through the bowels of the earth and is sacred. P. 30
The Love is both puzzling that inner place and looking from the site near or distant horizon, where everything converges to the point that lets you view and recognize the wonder and strangeness in front of the universe, creation, nature from a pantheism lived from the solitude and the proximity of the landscape in full communion with the world around
the wonder of the universe and that is how we know it.
Dialectic between sadness and joy, Leonor creates a poignant work of the poet's voice comes independent, thorough and consistent.
Death is a time limit hurry and yet it is life
What death could kill me? What death could stop the great harmony of my being is transformed into a thousand new and smaller as a result harmonies that shells? P. 111 awareness of finitude is overwhelming, but love triumphs over death:
all mine, and I'm around from first to last day.
Who said that eternity is beyond? I am eternity
p. 112
I had the honor of presenting the book Leonor Buffo, a young poet disappeared 68 years ago. Poet with my name and I cite in my book, THE HOUSE OF LOVE AND DEATH, which appeared at this house, home, nestled between the mountains, Cabana, beautiful scenery of the Sierras de Córdoba and say Everything
enmadejado and tied with a thousand threads of love. Leonor
Buffo
Bite silent spaces
words and she ignores him.
The pendulum has turned on its name and each letter naked
the echo that sleeps in his throat - and she does not know-
And his own name, between the slabs of
temple discovers Hidden. Attached to the bones sleeping under gravestones.
to the house, has become
where another woman with her name, for she weaves a web
. Only
dew on the grass at the foot of the mountain, is the crypt,
crying their tears of love
in the belfry.
is through the word Leonor Buffo exists today for us, beyond physical death occurred on September 6, 1941, when he was 23 years. Leonor
Buffo exists in the poetic dimension and she really gives the illusory world that builds from the self, from its own uniqueness.
Language is stripped of superfluous splendors where she is justified as a thinking, as construction of possible worlds, as having the fortune and misfortune. It is in this mirror we see the poet without masks that cover, is true in his poetry is shown as it is, innocent girl still, excited and spontaneous in love and amazed at the time with its load of forgetfulness passes the poems that disentangling in dichotomies where love is:
A dam to harness the wonderful water of life. Not a bit of it to miss-Dice -, which comes from the clouds, and passed through the bowels of the earth and is sacred. P. 30
The Love is both puzzling that inner place and looking from the site near or distant horizon, where everything converges to the point that lets you view and recognize the wonder and strangeness in front of the universe, creation, nature from a pantheism lived from the solitude and the proximity of the landscape in full communion with the world around
the wonder of the universe and that is how we know it.
Dialectic between sadness and joy, Leonor creates a poignant work of the poet's voice comes independent, thorough and consistent.
Death is a time limit hurry and yet it is life
What death could kill me? What death could stop the great harmony of my being is transformed into a thousand new and smaller as a result harmonies that shells? P. 111 awareness of finitude is overwhelming, but love triumphs over death:
all mine, and I'm around from first to last day.
Who said that eternity is beyond? I am eternity
p. 112
Saturday, July 24, 2010
Marzocchi Junior T Bomber
Simply the Best Olympic hero's first hundred years of Tourmalet
The ancient Olympic Games were banned by Emperor Theodosius I in 394 AD and considered a pagan ritual. Fifteen centuries later, Pierre Fredi, Baron de Coubertin, proposed rescue and peacekeeping pedagogical values \u200b\u200bof sport in ancient Greece, which led him, not without difficulties, to establish the modern Olympics, who would live the first edition in Athens in 1896.
In parallel, the French historian and linguist Michel Bréal proposed the creation of an endurance race that bore the name of the legendary battle of Marathon (490 BC) With it, commemorated the efforts of the soldier Pheidippides, who according to legend, ran the 40 kilometers separating the population of Athens announce the victory of the Athenians over the Persians, falling dead shortly after arrival. In Europe had already taken place long-distance running, but no one had linked the name of Marathon to these tests. Bréal personal friend of Baron de Coubertin, suggested to include it in the first Games, offering to give a silver cup to the winner, in memory of the feat of Pheidippides. Since then, the marathon would be considered the most important athletic event of the competition.
The results were not being good for the Greek athletes in the first Olympics of the modern era, since they had not achieved so far no wins. The Americans dominated the athletic, with nine wins in eleven races contested so far. Wounded in his pride, the last chance was in the marathon, which was to travel the 40 kilometers between the cities of Marathon and Athens.
The logic indicated that there were many chances that a local beat in this test, as 14 of the 18 participants were Greeks, although the four foreigners were athletes of international standing. At two hot afternoon April 10, 1896, after the opening speech of the mayor of Athens, the 18 brave as they marched from the Bridge Marathon. The starting signal was given by Colonel Papadiamantopoulos, mentor of several Greek soldiers, including our protagonist, Spriridon Louis.
Hellenic pride Salvador
The first news came through messengers, who followed the race on a bicycle or on horseback, were not very hopeful as at kilometer 16 led the test three of the four foreign athletes (Australian Edwin Flack, Albin Lermusiaux French, and American Arthur Blake). The latest news received by the 70,000 spectators who packed the Panathenaic Stadium in Athens was that Edwin Flack walked alone in head and near the stadium, which caused widespread disillusionment. Suddenly, to the surprise and clamor of the spectators, began to take hold the rumor that a local runner had taken the lead of the test. Moments later, Colonel Papadiamantopoulos began to ride in the stadium and confirmed the news: the winner was coming ... and it was a Hellenic athlete.
Spiridon Louis, who was not among the favorites, went first to the stadium to cross the finish line as winner with a time of 2 hours 58 minutes 50 seconds, between the cheers of spectators among whom was the Crown Prince Constantine who, count according to the chroniclers of the period, down from the stands to accompany him on his trot during the last minute. After the race, the winner made his famous statement honoring Pheidippides: "Rejoice, citizens have prevailed." With its stunning victory saved Hellenic pride and went on to be a great national hero. Spiridon Louis's life completely change thereafter.
later emerged that the three foreign athletes marching in front of the race had fainted by not knowing how to regulate their forces, went too fast and paid recklessness. Lermusiaux came out ahead and alone in the middle of the race, but soon began to stagger exhausted unable to continue the march. This sorry state was overtaken by Flack, who had made a huge effort to catch up. Close and the victory, just four kilometers from the finish, also began to tumble and raving attacked a spectator who sought his assistance. Finally, second and third place went two Greek athletes (Charilaos Vasilakpos and Spiridon Belok), although the latter was disqualified after admitting part of the journey traveled by carriage, passing the third-place finish at the Hungarian Gyula Kellner, the only outsider who completed the test. Only nine athletes completed that historic race.
athletic career
Short
Born January 12, 1873 in the village of Maroussi near Athens, in the midst of a very humble family, Spiridon Louis had to be put to work from very young, but we can not determine for sure if he was pastor, mailman or seller of water (at that time the city of Athens did not have a potable water system), because the versions of your profession are very different. Its preparation had been limited as an athlete, yet they showed some innate powers for the race. was selected to participate in the first edition of the Olympic Games by Colonel Papadiamantopoulos, his superior in the military, aware of his athletic ability after seeing him excel in the military marches. Louis was preparing through prayer and, according to comments at the time, spent the night before the Olympic marathon on his knees in the light of the candles offered to the icons and eating dried figs. After
crowned at the 1896 Games as a national hero, and despite not re- compete in any other race of importance, was filled with all kinds of hospitality and gifts, and to various shops, hairdressers and restaurants offered free services for years. He also received a property of the Greek government, as well as a horse and cart to carry water to their people. After having caused the delirium in his country and an unusual interest in the rest of the world are very few news of his whereabouts since that time.
the Olympic movement recognition came 40 years later, when he was appointed Honorary Chairman of the 1936 Berlin Olympics, where he was treated with all kinds of attention. Four years later, on March 26, 1940, died at 67 years of age. But his myth has continued and even enlarged, with the passage of time, especially in Greece. The best proof that his home country will not forget is that when Athens once again host an Olympic edition in 2004 was named the new Olympic stadium with the name of Spiridon Louis, the first hero of the modern Olympic Games, the winner of first major marathon history, the Greek who won this event 2,400 years after Athens defeated the Persian army at the plains of the same name.
Spiridon Louis, a Greek athlete semidesconocido humble, was the star of the first Games modern era. His victory in the Olympic marathon in 1896, commemorating the deeds of the soldier Pheidippides, saved Hellenic pride, made him a national hero and his life changed forever.
The ancient Olympic Games were banned by Emperor Theodosius I in 394 AD and considered a pagan ritual. Fifteen centuries later, Pierre Fredi, Baron de Coubertin, proposed rescue and peacekeeping pedagogical values \u200b\u200bof sport in ancient Greece, which led him, not without difficulties, to establish the modern Olympics, who would live the first edition in Athens in 1896.
In parallel, the French historian and linguist Michel Bréal proposed the creation of an endurance race that bore the name of the legendary battle of Marathon (490 BC) With it, commemorated the efforts of the soldier Pheidippides, who according to legend, ran the 40 kilometers separating the population of Athens announce the victory of the Athenians over the Persians, falling dead shortly after arrival. In Europe had already taken place long-distance running, but no one had linked the name of Marathon to these tests. Bréal personal friend of Baron de Coubertin, suggested to include it in the first Games, offering to give a silver cup to the winner, in memory of the feat of Pheidippides. Since then, the marathon would be considered the most important athletic event of the competition.
The results were not being good for the Greek athletes in the first Olympics of the modern era, since they had not achieved so far no wins. The Americans dominated the athletic, with nine wins in eleven races contested so far. Wounded in his pride, the last chance was in the marathon, which was to travel the 40 kilometers between the cities of Marathon and Athens.
The logic indicated that there were many chances that a local beat in this test, as 14 of the 18 participants were Greeks, although the four foreigners were athletes of international standing. At two hot afternoon April 10, 1896, after the opening speech of the mayor of Athens, the 18 brave as they marched from the Bridge Marathon. The starting signal was given by Colonel Papadiamantopoulos, mentor of several Greek soldiers, including our protagonist, Spriridon Louis.
Hellenic pride Salvador
The first news came through messengers, who followed the race on a bicycle or on horseback, were not very hopeful as at kilometer 16 led the test three of the four foreign athletes (Australian Edwin Flack, Albin Lermusiaux French, and American Arthur Blake). The latest news received by the 70,000 spectators who packed the Panathenaic Stadium in Athens was that Edwin Flack walked alone in head and near the stadium, which caused widespread disillusionment. Suddenly, to the surprise and clamor of the spectators, began to take hold the rumor that a local runner had taken the lead of the test. Moments later, Colonel Papadiamantopoulos began to ride in the stadium and confirmed the news: the winner was coming ... and it was a Hellenic athlete.
Spiridon Louis, who was not among the favorites, went first to the stadium to cross the finish line as winner with a time of 2 hours 58 minutes 50 seconds, between the cheers of spectators among whom was the Crown Prince Constantine who, count according to the chroniclers of the period, down from the stands to accompany him on his trot during the last minute. After the race, the winner made his famous statement honoring Pheidippides: "Rejoice, citizens have prevailed." With its stunning victory saved Hellenic pride and went on to be a great national hero. Spiridon Louis's life completely change thereafter.
later emerged that the three foreign athletes marching in front of the race had fainted by not knowing how to regulate their forces, went too fast and paid recklessness. Lermusiaux came out ahead and alone in the middle of the race, but soon began to stagger exhausted unable to continue the march. This sorry state was overtaken by Flack, who had made a huge effort to catch up. Close and the victory, just four kilometers from the finish, also began to tumble and raving attacked a spectator who sought his assistance. Finally, second and third place went two Greek athletes (Charilaos Vasilakpos and Spiridon Belok), although the latter was disqualified after admitting part of the journey traveled by carriage, passing the third-place finish at the Hungarian Gyula Kellner, the only outsider who completed the test. Only nine athletes completed that historic race.
athletic career
Short
Born January 12, 1873 in the village of Maroussi near Athens, in the midst of a very humble family, Spiridon Louis had to be put to work from very young, but we can not determine for sure if he was pastor, mailman or seller of water (at that time the city of Athens did not have a potable water system), because the versions of your profession are very different. Its preparation had been limited as an athlete, yet they showed some innate powers for the race. was selected to participate in the first edition of the Olympic Games by Colonel Papadiamantopoulos, his superior in the military, aware of his athletic ability after seeing him excel in the military marches. Louis was preparing through prayer and, according to comments at the time, spent the night before the Olympic marathon on his knees in the light of the candles offered to the icons and eating dried figs. After
crowned at the 1896 Games as a national hero, and despite not re- compete in any other race of importance, was filled with all kinds of hospitality and gifts, and to various shops, hairdressers and restaurants offered free services for years. He also received a property of the Greek government, as well as a horse and cart to carry water to their people. After having caused the delirium in his country and an unusual interest in the rest of the world are very few news of his whereabouts since that time.
the Olympic movement recognition came 40 years later, when he was appointed Honorary Chairman of the 1936 Berlin Olympics, where he was treated with all kinds of attention. Four years later, on March 26, 1940, died at 67 years of age. But his myth has continued and even enlarged, with the passage of time, especially in Greece. The best proof that his home country will not forget is that when Athens once again host an Olympic edition in 2004 was named the new Olympic stadium with the name of Spiridon Louis, the first hero of the modern Olympic Games, the winner of first major marathon history, the Greek who won this event 2,400 years after Athens defeated the Persian army at the plains of the same name.
Wednesday, July 7, 2010
Rainwax Wrecked My Windshield
is not the highest mountain or longest, or the largest vertical drop which usually rise in the Tour de France ... and yet it is the most legendary. At this year is to raise twice to mark the centenary of the first time the Grande Boucle moved through the Pyrenean summit. Then crowned first Octave Lapize who kilometers later, shattered by the toughness of the stage, shouted to the organizers: "You guys are murderers." Its ramps, steeped in the best epic cycling, have been the scene of a thousand and one stories to remember.
" Tour de France. The most important cycling race in the world. A run of a month. Paris-Lyon-Marseille-Toulouse-Bordeaux-Nantes-Paris. award 20,000 francs. " On January 19, 1903 the newspaper L'Auto (predecessor of the current L'Equipe) announced on its front page the birth of a cycling race, halfway between competitive sport and adventure. The race had been conceived a month earlier by the young editor of the cycling section, Geo Lefevre, in order to increase poor sales of the newspaper. The idea appealed to the editor, Henri Desgrange, and July 1 of that year 60 brave souls gathered at the gates of the Reveil Matin cafe on the outskirts of Paris to take part in the first edition of the Tour de France. A challenge, all crazy.
ahead had had to travel 2,428 miles in six stages, and between them gave the organization a few days of rest to avoid fatigue deaths. The winner of that first edition, the French builder and chimney sweep Maurice Garin, took 94 hours and 33 minutes to complete the course, to an average of 25.739 km / h, the last of the 21 survivors spent more than 65 hours Garin. From the outset, the French followed with passion the new epic, and the cyclists suffered acquired the status of heroes. chronic Lefevre's vibrant light readers and sales of L'Auto soar this month of July 1903, reaching 65,000 copies daily. But Desgrange wanted more. "Epic, sacrifice and glory" was his maxim. Always looking for the limits, decided to give a twist to his madness difficulties entering the first mountain.
addressed in the 1905 Tour's first mountain to climb to the Ballon d'Alsace in the Vosges, 9 km with an average gradient of 6%. Crowned the top leading René Pottier, who alone bore the entire climb up the bike. He made the ascent to the then amazing speed of 20 km / h, but had to drop dead the next day in pain because of cramps. After that first experience mountain Desgrange enthusiastically declares: "From now on, nothing is impossible. The Tour must be the greatest proof of publication that has ever been. " In 1906 the race made a brief foray into the small Alps. And in this continuous search for new challenges we, four years later, at a moment that forever changed the history of the Tour de France, cycling and sport. And it all started with a lie ...
A lie that changed history
In January 1910 Henri Desgrange met with his staff to plan the eighth edition of the race and find new venues to increase the interest in it. The journalist Alphonse Steines Point Blank released their proposal: that the race crossed the Pyrenees, then an inhospitable, uninhabited, with dirt roads in dilapidated state and even bears roam freely through the summits. "You're crazy," snapped the pattern of the race. But Steiner was a stubborn guy and eager to add a new dimension the Tour, insisted in his mad proposal. Desgrange
knew that the few raids in the mountains had been a great public success, but also feared that those giants Pyrenees (Peyresourde, Aspin, Tourmalet and Aubisque) were too hard to cyclists. finally agreed on one condition: that his colleagues examined the future path of the stage and personally finds that those roads were passable. Months later, after the harsh winter, Stein rented a car and driver and traveled to southern France, which until then was unknown territory and wild. The Peyresourde and Aspin were able to cross the smooth, but the Tourmalet, with its top still covered by snow in spring, would not be so simple, in fact, the natives tried to dissuade him of his idea. Stubborn as few
, Stein was not discouraged. They climbed down that road in appalling conditions until, at four kilometers from the summit, snow and ice on the road became completely impassable. Then the driver, frightened, refused to continue. "Give you around and wait for me in Barèges. I still walk, "said the intrepid reporter. Through the night to fall ventured with street shoes and a cane in hand, looking uphill to the top. In the midst of utter darkness, with snow covering the knees, walking between ravines and the danger of bears on the prowl, Stein managed to walk the four miles that separated him from the summit and begin the descent path of that location.
Hours later, in middle of the night, a raid organized by the driver found him exhausted, numb with cold, near Barèges. After taking a hot bath and eat voraciously, was ready to send a telegram to Paris, to the attention of Henri Desgrange. The lie, the big lie that forever changed the history of the Tour de France, cycling and sport: "Crossed Tourmalet. Very good route. Perfectly practicable. "
Ninety minutes of agony
On 21 July 1910 Tour that was going to travel for the first time for the mountain, as part of a hellish stage (Luchon-Bayonne, 326 km) , which would have to climb, one after another, the four giants of the Pyrenees, and three other minor ports (Soulor, Tortes and Osquich). At half past three was given the start and end of the street racers are already with the first climb of the day. After passing the Peyresourde and Aspin, two French riders are featured at the foot of the Tourmalet. On a field stones and earth, take up ninety minutes in his 17 miles. For Octave Lapize and Gustave Garrigou are ninety minutes eternal agony and struggle against the unknown.
The first alternating sections on the bike with others, the hardest, walking with her in tow, the latter is placed standing on the pedals again and again, and refuses to get off even though it costs to maintain the balance . Lapize go down in history as the first cyclist who crowned this monster of over 2,000 meters; Garrigou as the one who made the entire climb without setting foot on land, which earned him a prize of 100 francs. Are the half past seven and still have 250 miles ahead, with the ascension to also fearsome Aubisque. On top of this port, on the verge of asphyxiation and muscles trembling with grief, pencil off the bike and throw one of the organizers angrily yells: "Murderers, you are criminals."
After numerous fainting and recoveries, the mustachioed Octave Lapize Bayonne wins defeating the Italian sprint Albini. It was 17:40 in the afternoon, had taken 14 hours and 10 minutes to complete the stage. After they were coming for hours, the other runners, many of them in a sorry state we had to carry him to the shelters. The subsequent days passed off as the victor in his hotel in Bayonne lying and putting his foot crushed in a bowl with salt and vinegar. Beside her, Gustave Garrigou read aloud the chronic inflamed on Desgrange Pyrenean stage, Stein and Lefevre in L'Auto .
A week later, Lapize -1.65 meters and a robust body-is the winner of the Tour de France 1910. Sergeant of aviation in the First World War, French was killed on July 14, 1917 when the plane he was piloting was shot on Verdun. On his body was found five German bullets. One had pierced the heart, the heart strong and powerful that prompted his legs to make history on the ramps of the Tourmalet. And since that first ascent of one hundred years have passed, and this giant Pyrenean has become the port most visited by the Tour (it has risen by 81 times), the scene of sublime and extraordinary exploits weaknesses in the most emblematic mountain this test, although not the highest, or longer, or harder.
Forging a legend can
The Tourmalet climb two sides, to reach 2,115 meters in altitude of the summit: to Saint Marie de Campan, the best-known route, where Station slopes of La Mongie, and Barèges, somewhat narrower road. In the first case, is 17.2 km climb with an average gradient of 7.4% gradient, the second, 19 kilometers to 7.4% also. For both roads, cyclists are ramps with a slope exceeding 11%.
And if hard and difficult the climb is not less dangerous is the fall, a nightmare for cyclists not well versed in the art of falling. Down the mountain, in 1969, Eddy Merckx began one of the most marvelous exhibitions ever seen in cycling history [Stage 17: Luchon-Mourenx. Already outstanding leader, and after a ride 140 km solo, surpassed by eight minutes to his closest pursuers: Pingeon, Poulidor, Gimondi ...; the Canibal in pure]; down the mountain, in 1991, Miguel Indurain started winning the first of his five Tours [stage 13: Jaca-Val Louron, 232 miles and five ports. The Navarre makes a rapid descent of the Tourmalet that he's left alone in front of the stage, with the Aspin and Val Louron on the horizon Claudio Chiappucci decides to wait, and together they begin a ride that would give him his first yellow jersey]. So decisive in the rise and in the fall, this mountain is unforgiving to the weak.
are so many epic scenes lived in their seats (Ottavio Bottecchia in 1924, Lucy Buysse with snow-capped in 1926, Gino Bartali, Fausto Coppi, Jean Robic, Bahamontes, who crowned him featured on four occasions, Merckx, Van Impe, Pedro Delgado ...) that we find impossible to remember them all in this article. Yes we will, however, with what happened in the Tour in 1913, an episode that perfectly illustrates the harshness of that heroic cycling. After crossing the Tourmalet in second position, the Frenchman Eugene Christophe realizes that he has broken the fork of his bike. Do not want to leave (all his team mates had conspired to get to Paris) and under the rules of the time he it should repair the machine, so has no choice but to charge it on your shoulder and walk down 14 kilometers until you reach the blacksmith of St Marie de Campan . Unable to get help from the blacksmith, Christophe, who is a mechanic, gets to the forge and fix your bike before resuming the march, four hours after being crowned the Tourmalet. Had become the virtual leader of the race and was left without any choice, still, after rising in solitary Aspin and Peyresourde, enters open control goal. Finally, finished seventh in Paris. A plaque at the building of Saint Marie de Campan commemorates his iron will.
This edition of 2010, to mark the centenary of his discovery for cycling, the Grande Boucle Tourmalet climb twice, the second one as the end of the 17 th stage. It is the tribute that the organization has prepared a mountain ramps which are imbued with the best epic and legendary cyclist, a mountain forever changed the history of the sport and became the Tour de France in a race immortal.
Sunday, July 4, 2010
Catapult Design And Blueprints
"The Challenge of Creation" by Juan Rulfo. AFRICA
who unfortunately I did not tell me stories, in our village people is close, yes, completely, one is a stranger there. They
them talking, sitting on their luggage in the evening to tell stories and stuff, but when one comes, they fall silent or begin to talk about the weather: "Today it seems that there are the clouds ..." Anyway, I did not have the fortune to hear the greatest story-telling why I had to invent them and I believe that precisely one of the principles of literary creation is the invention, imagination. We are liars, every writer who believes he is a liar, literature is a lie, but that lie out a recreation of reality to recreate reality is thus one of the fundamental principles of creation.
think there are three steps: the first is creating the character, the latter create the environment where that character will move and the third is how that character will speak, how they will express. These three points of support are all that is required to tell a story: now, I have him fear the blank page, and above all in pencil, because I write by hand, but I mean, more or less, what my procedures in a very personal way. When I started writing I do not believe in inspiration, I never believed in the inspiration, the subject of writing is a matter of work, start writing and see what comes out and fill pages and pages, to suddenly see a word that give the key to what to do, what will be that. Sometimes it is to write five, six or ten pages and not see the character I wanted to appear, the one real character has to move by itself. Suddenly appears and arises, one is going along, you go after him. To the extent that the character comes to life, one can, in ways that an unknown but, still alive, leading one to reality, or unreality, if you will. At the same time, manages to create what one can say that, ultimately, seems to have happened, or could have happened or might happen but never happened. So I think that this question of creation is fundamental to think about what one knows, what lies will say, think if you go into the truth, the reality of things known, as one has seen or heard, is making history, reportage.
I have long criticized my countrymen that I tell lies, do not do history, or that everything I talk or write, they say, has never happened and so. For me the first thing is the imagination, within three points of support of which we spoke earlier is flowing imagination, the imagination is infinite, no limits, and must break where you close the circle, there is a door can be a door window and that door must lead, must go. Thus it appears another thing called intuition: intuition leads one to think something that has not happened, but what is happening in writing.
Specifically, it works with: imagination, intuition and an apparent truth. When this is achieved, then accomplished the story you want to make known: the work is solitary, you can not conceive of collective work in the literature, and that alone leads one to become a kind of medium of things know yourself but not knowing that only the unconscious, or intuition lead one to create and keep creating.
I think that is, in principle, the basis of every story, of any story you want to say. Now, there is another element, another very important thing also is wanting to tell something about certain issues, we know perfectly well that there are only three basic themes: love, life and death. No more, no more tracks, so to capture their normal development, one must know how to treat them, how to give, not to repeat what others have said. Then, the treatment given to a story leads, although the subject has been treated infinitely, to say things differently, we are expecting the same thing been told from Virgil to not know who else, the Chinese or whoever . But you have to find the foundation, how to address the issue, and I think in creative writing, form-call-literary form is in force, which causes a history has an interest and call attention to others. As
publishes a story or a book, this book is dead, the author does not think about it again. Before, however, if not completely finished, what goes around in his head constantly: the issue is still hanging around until you realize, from experience, that is not concluded, that something has been left inside, then must restart the story, we must see where the failure have to see what the character did not move by itself. In my personal case, I have the feature eliminate me from the story, never tell a story that has personal experience that there is something autobiographical or that I have seen or heard, if I have to imagine or recreate, if ever there is a point of support. That is the mystery of literary creation is mysterious, and one concludes that if the character does not work, and the author has to help you survive, then it fails immediately. I'm talking about basic things, you must forgive me, but my experiences have been them, I never reported anything that has happened, my bases are intuition and, within that, there has emerged what is alien to the author.
The problem, as I said before, is to find the item, the character and what to say and what to do that character, how it will come alive. As the character is forced by the author, immediately gets into a dead end. One of the hardest things I've ever done, precisely, is the elimination of the author, remove myself. I let those characters work themselves and not my listing, because then entered the wandering of the trial, the vagary, does one even get their own ideas, he is a philosopher, in order, and you try to make believe in the ideology that has one, his way of thinking about life, or the world, human beings, what is the principle that moved the man's actions. When that happens, it becomes an essayist. We know of many novels, essay, literary work that is very novel-test; but generally, the genre that is less susceptible to this is the story. For me the story is a genre really more important than the novel because you have to concentrate on a few pages to say many things you have to synthesize, it should be curbed, in that the storyteller is a bit like the poet, the great poet. The poet has to be stopping the horse and not get out of hand, if goes on a rampage and write by writing, the words will come out one after another, and then just fails. The essential thing is just hold back, not out of hand, not empty, the story has this peculiarity, I just prefer the story, especially about the novel because the novel is strongly susceptible to these ramblings.
The novel, say, is a genre that encompasses all, is a pocket where it all fit stories, drama or action or non-philosophical philosophical essays, a number of topics which are going to fill that sack, whereas in the story is one that reduced synthesized and in a few words to say or tell a story that others tell in two hundred pages, that is, more or less, the idea that I have on the creation, on the principle of literary creation; clear that not a brilliant exposition that I'm doing, but I'm talking about a very basic, because I fear I have a lot of intellectuals, so I try to avoid them, when I see an intellectual, I will move back, and I think the writer should be the least intellectual of all thinkers, because their ideas and thoughts are very personal things that do not have to influence others or do what he wants others to do, when it comes to that conclusion, when it comes to that site, or call it final, then one feels that something has been achieved.
As you all know, there is no writer to write everything you think it is very difficult to transfer his thoughts to writing, I think nobody does, nobody did, but simply, there are many things to be developed are lost. 
who unfortunately I did not tell me stories, in our village people is close, yes, completely, one is a stranger there. They
them talking, sitting on their luggage in the evening to tell stories and stuff, but when one comes, they fall silent or begin to talk about the weather: "Today it seems that there are the clouds ..." Anyway, I did not have the fortune to hear the greatest story-telling why I had to invent them and I believe that precisely one of the principles of literary creation is the invention, imagination. We are liars, every writer who believes he is a liar, literature is a lie, but that lie out a recreation of reality to recreate reality is thus one of the fundamental principles of creation.
think there are three steps: the first is creating the character, the latter create the environment where that character will move and the third is how that character will speak, how they will express. These three points of support are all that is required to tell a story: now, I have him fear the blank page, and above all in pencil, because I write by hand, but I mean, more or less, what my procedures in a very personal way. When I started writing I do not believe in inspiration, I never believed in the inspiration, the subject of writing is a matter of work, start writing and see what comes out and fill pages and pages, to suddenly see a word that give the key to what to do, what will be that. Sometimes it is to write five, six or ten pages and not see the character I wanted to appear, the one real character has to move by itself. Suddenly appears and arises, one is going along, you go after him. To the extent that the character comes to life, one can, in ways that an unknown but, still alive, leading one to reality, or unreality, if you will. At the same time, manages to create what one can say that, ultimately, seems to have happened, or could have happened or might happen but never happened. So I think that this question of creation is fundamental to think about what one knows, what lies will say, think if you go into the truth, the reality of things known, as one has seen or heard, is making history, reportage.
I have long criticized my countrymen that I tell lies, do not do history, or that everything I talk or write, they say, has never happened and so. For me the first thing is the imagination, within three points of support of which we spoke earlier is flowing imagination, the imagination is infinite, no limits, and must break where you close the circle, there is a door can be a door window and that door must lead, must go. Thus it appears another thing called intuition: intuition leads one to think something that has not happened, but what is happening in writing.
Specifically, it works with: imagination, intuition and an apparent truth. When this is achieved, then accomplished the story you want to make known: the work is solitary, you can not conceive of collective work in the literature, and that alone leads one to become a kind of medium of things know yourself but not knowing that only the unconscious, or intuition lead one to create and keep creating.
I think that is, in principle, the basis of every story, of any story you want to say. Now, there is another element, another very important thing also is wanting to tell something about certain issues, we know perfectly well that there are only three basic themes: love, life and death. No more, no more tracks, so to capture their normal development, one must know how to treat them, how to give, not to repeat what others have said. Then, the treatment given to a story leads, although the subject has been treated infinitely, to say things differently, we are expecting the same thing been told from Virgil to not know who else, the Chinese or whoever . But you have to find the foundation, how to address the issue, and I think in creative writing, form-call-literary form is in force, which causes a history has an interest and call attention to others. As
publishes a story or a book, this book is dead, the author does not think about it again. Before, however, if not completely finished, what goes around in his head constantly: the issue is still hanging around until you realize, from experience, that is not concluded, that something has been left inside, then must restart the story, we must see where the failure have to see what the character did not move by itself. In my personal case, I have the feature eliminate me from the story, never tell a story that has personal experience that there is something autobiographical or that I have seen or heard, if I have to imagine or recreate, if ever there is a point of support. That is the mystery of literary creation is mysterious, and one concludes that if the character does not work, and the author has to help you survive, then it fails immediately. I'm talking about basic things, you must forgive me, but my experiences have been them, I never reported anything that has happened, my bases are intuition and, within that, there has emerged what is alien to the author.
The problem, as I said before, is to find the item, the character and what to say and what to do that character, how it will come alive. As the character is forced by the author, immediately gets into a dead end. One of the hardest things I've ever done, precisely, is the elimination of the author, remove myself. I let those characters work themselves and not my listing, because then entered the wandering of the trial, the vagary, does one even get their own ideas, he is a philosopher, in order, and you try to make believe in the ideology that has one, his way of thinking about life, or the world, human beings, what is the principle that moved the man's actions. When that happens, it becomes an essayist. We know of many novels, essay, literary work that is very novel-test; but generally, the genre that is less susceptible to this is the story. For me the story is a genre really more important than the novel because you have to concentrate on a few pages to say many things you have to synthesize, it should be curbed, in that the storyteller is a bit like the poet, the great poet. The poet has to be stopping the horse and not get out of hand, if goes on a rampage and write by writing, the words will come out one after another, and then just fails. The essential thing is just hold back, not out of hand, not empty, the story has this peculiarity, I just prefer the story, especially about the novel because the novel is strongly susceptible to these ramblings.
The novel, say, is a genre that encompasses all, is a pocket where it all fit stories, drama or action or non-philosophical philosophical essays, a number of topics which are going to fill that sack, whereas in the story is one that reduced synthesized and in a few words to say or tell a story that others tell in two hundred pages, that is, more or less, the idea that I have on the creation, on the principle of literary creation; clear that not a brilliant exposition that I'm doing, but I'm talking about a very basic, because I fear I have a lot of intellectuals, so I try to avoid them, when I see an intellectual, I will move back, and I think the writer should be the least intellectual of all thinkers, because their ideas and thoughts are very personal things that do not have to influence others or do what he wants others to do, when it comes to that conclusion, when it comes to that site, or call it final, then one feels that something has been achieved.
As you all know, there is no writer to write everything you think it is very difficult to transfer his thoughts to writing, I think nobody does, nobody did, but simply, there are many things to be developed are lost.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)